I think this beats
manos74's"Boyfriend Paper" hands down. It's a summary of an article that has to have something to do with chemistry -- the writer (also known as my lab partner) chose a Dr. Gott column from the paper. First warning sign -- never try to summarize an article that is shorter than the summary has to be. Consequently the writer spends half the time saying: "First I will show this. Then I will show this. Finally I will show this. *shows point 1* Okay, now I will show point 2. *showspoint 2* Finally I will show Point 3. *shows Point 3* So, I have shown points 1, 2 and 3. In conclusion, chemistry is important to our everyday lives."
In two pages I have learned that:
-- Water softeners use NaCl (or, as the Native Americans called it, salt) in some mysterious way to take out calcium and other 'hard' minerals. I think it involves superpowers.
-- The amounts of salt from said water-softening process will not affect someone who is on a low salt diet. The writer knows this because Dr. Gott said so.
No wonder the paper feels padded.
I think I went all Simon on this paper.
In two pages I have learned that:
-- Water softeners use NaCl (or, as the Native Americans called it, salt) in some mysterious way to take out calcium and other 'hard' minerals. I think it involves superpowers.
-- The amounts of salt from said water-softening process will not affect someone who is on a low salt diet. The writer knows this because Dr. Gott said so.
No wonder the paper feels padded.
I think I went all Simon on this paper.